The problem of the knowledge of the thinking substance in the Meditations and in the Objections and Replies of Rene Descartes

Main Article Content

Vinícius França Freitas
Ana Cláudia Teodoro Sousa

Abstract

In this article, the hypothesis is developed that Descartes does not clearly articulate theknowledge of the thinking substance in the Meditations on First Philosophy and in Objections and Replies. It is argued that such exposition is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the status of Cartesian philosophy at the time of writing the Meditations, particularly to grasp Descartes' conception of the knowledge of the thinking substance in the years 1641 and 1642. Asknown, knowledge of the thinking substance is a fundamental element in Descartes' philosophy.Firstly, Descartes' two modes of presenting knowledge of the thinking substance in the Meditations are examined, highlighting the issues each entails. Secondly, drawing from the Objections andReplies: especially the fifth and seventh, criticisms from Pierre Gassendi and Pierre Bourdin regarding the knowledge of the thinking substance are presented. Both Gassendi and Bourdin emphasize that the text of the Meditations does not sufficiently clarify how the thinking substanceis known. They question the possibility of such knowledge, pointing out the ambiguity andobscurity of Cartesian responses. It is concluded that in the Meditations, Descartes confronts aninsurmountable gap between the ontology of substance and its knowledge, which prompts him tofurther develop and clarify his theory in later writings.

Article Details

Section
Monographic articles

References

ALANEN, L. 2016. The Second Meditation and the nature of the human mind. In: The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations. David Cunning (editor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88-106.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139088220.005

AUBENQUE, P. 1999. La transformation cartésienne du concept aristotélicien de substance. In: Enrahonar: quaderns de filosofia. Descartes. Allò racional i allò real, pp. 87-93.

https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1073

BEYSSADE, J. 1997. A teoria cartesiana da substância: equivocidade ou analogia? In: Analytica. Volume II, número 2, pp. 11-36. Tradução de Lia Levy.

https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/410/367

CHAPPELL, V. 2008. Descartes on Substance. In: A Companion to Descartes. Janet Broughton e John Carriero (editores). Malden, Oxford e Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 251-270.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696439.ch15

DESCARTES, R. 1997. Princípios da Filosofia. João Gama (Tradutor). Lisboa: Edições 70.

DESCARTES, R. 2004. Meditações sobre filosofia primeira. Edição bilíngue. Fausto Castilho (Tradutor). Campinas: UNICAMP.

DESCARTES, R. 1904. Oeuvres de Descartes: Meditationes de Prima Philosophia. Volume VII. Charles Adams e Paul Tannery (editores). Paris: Léopold Cerf.

DESCARTES, R. 1905. Oeuvres de Descartes: Principia Philosophiae. Volume VIII. Charles Adams e Paul Tannery (editores). Paris: Léopold Cerf.

DESCARTES, R. 1973. Obra Escolhida. J. Guinsburg e Bento Prado Júnior (Tradutores). 2ª Edição. São Paulo: Difel.

DESCARTES, R. 1995. Objections and Replies. In: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume II. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff e Dugald Murdoch (Tradutores). Cambridge / New York / Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63-398.

DESCARTES, R. 1999. Regras para a Orientação do Espírito. Maria Ermantina Galvão (Tradutora). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

FAYE, E. 2012. Descartes e a consciência em La Recherche de la Verité par la Lumière Naturelle. A. C. Armond, F. J. Fernandes e F. Linhares (Tradutores). In: Educação e filosofia. Volume XXVI, número 51, pp. 145-162.

https://doi.org/10.14393/REVEDFIL.issn.0102-6801.v26n51a2012-p145a162

GRENE, M. 1999. Descartes and Skepticism. In: The Review of Metaphysics. Volume LII, número 3, pp. 553-571.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20131190

GUEROULT, M. 1953. Descartes selon l’Ordre des Raison. Parte I (L’Ame et Dieu). Paris: Aubier - Éditions Montaigne.

KENNINGTON, R. 1971. The Finitude of Descartes’ Evil Genius. In: Journal of the History of Ideas. Volume XXXII, número 3, pp. 441-446.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2708359

LAPORTE, J. 1988. Le rationalisme de Descartes. 3ª Edição. Paris: PUF.

LARMORE, C. 2006. Descartes and Skepticism. In: The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Stephen Gaukorger (Editor). Malden / Oxford / Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 17-30.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776476.ch2

LARMORE, C. 2014. The First Meditation: Skeptical Doubt and Certainty. In: The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations. David Cunning (Editor). Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48-67.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139088220.003

LOCKE, J. 1999. Ensaio sobre o entendimento humano. Eduardo Abranches de Soveral (tradutor). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

MALEBRANCHE, N. 2004. A busca da verdade: Textos escolhidos. Plínio Junqueira Smith (Seleção, introdução, tradução e notas). São Paulo: Discurso Editorial.

NADLER, S. 2011. Consciousness Among the Cartesians. In: Studia Leibnitiana. Volume XIIIL, número 2, pp.132-144.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/43695740

PALIARD, J. 1941, La connaissance par idee et la connaissance par sentiment chez Malebranche. In : Les Études Philosophiques. Ano 15, número 1/2, pp. 16-19.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20840842

ROCHA, E. 2006. Dualismo, substância e atributo essencial no sistema cartesiano. In: Analytica, volume 10, número 2, pp. 89-105.

https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/520/475

ROZEMOND, M. 2006. The Nature of the Mind. In: The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Stephen Gaukoger (editor). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 48-66.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776476.ch4

SCARROW, D. 1972. Descartes on His Substance and His Essence. In: American Philosophical Quarterly. Volume IX, número 1, pp. 18-28.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009417

SCHECHTMAN, A. 2016. Substance and Independence in Descartes. In: Philosophical Review. Volume CXXV, número 2, pp. 155-204.

https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3453167

SCHIFFER, S. 1976. Descartes on His Essence. In: The Philosophical Review. Volume LXXXV, número 1, pp. 21-43

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184253

SCHMALTZ, T. 1992. Descartes and Malebranche on Mind-Body Union. In: The Philosophical Review. Volume CI, número 2, pp. 281-325.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2185536

SCHMALTZ, T. 1994. Malebranche on Descartes on Mind-Body Distinctness. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy. Volume XXXII, número 4, pp. 573-603.

https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1994.0083

SECADA, J. 2006. The Doctrine of Substance. In: The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Stephen Gaukroger (editor). Maldent, Oxford e Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 86-103.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776476.ch5

VALENTIM, M. 2009. Substância e objeto: a ontologia cartesiana. In: Analytica. Volume 13, número 2, pp. 181-223.

https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/566

WILSON, M. 2005. Descartes. London e New York: Routledge.